|
Post by Caesar on Apr 3, 2006 22:28:27 GMT -8
Chuck norris is certified at chiropractics, but he is too certified, which is why he also is a certified excecutioner You have officially redeemed yourself Tyler. That was awesome. Chuck Norris killed Kenny...for good.
|
|
|
Post by Chief (n7x Dominance) on Apr 4, 2006 19:03:58 GMT -8
damn luigi that was good
|
|
|
Post by Chief (n7x Dominance) on Apr 4, 2006 19:05:06 GMT -8
oh and i have a special video surprise for rory, and it is in the form of a video lol
it has to do with that paddle, cuz i found Walker Texas Ranger on today and it was that episode
|
|
|
Post by Zangief on Apr 5, 2006 10:17:01 GMT -8
Chuck Norris's tears can cure cancer...too bad Chuck Norris never cries.
|
|
|
Post by Zangief on Apr 5, 2006 10:21:02 GMT -8
The problem with people making up their own is that they usually suck balls.
Joe, chuck norris had these way before vin deasel. Besides, they are way cooler with chuck over anyone else because he is the lamest tv/movie star ever, but really good in real life.
|
|
|
Post by Zangief on Apr 5, 2006 10:23:10 GMT -8
AND....
some of these so called "originals" that you guys are making are rip offs. You are taking established chuck norris facts and substituting your own phrases into them, thats called plagerism.
|
|
|
Post by Roggie on Apr 5, 2006 15:23:31 GMT -8
It isn't plagarism if you change the words around, to put it in your own words. (was taught that in journalism class)
|
|
|
Post by Caesar on Apr 5, 2006 19:22:20 GMT -8
That's called "spinning." Watch Bill O'Reilly.
Haha, and to an extent, Jeremy is right. But it's better than copying an exact one, *JEREMY ahem*
|
|
|
Post by Zangief on Apr 6, 2006 15:41:33 GMT -8
I am not claiming them on my own, that is the difference (I think yours was the only original one Ryan).
Actually Roggie, you are 100% incorrect, as usual. If you switch the words around, it is still plagiarism. Its all about the idea the original author was portraying. They pound this into you like non other when you take writing classes in college. You will be cool as long as you site your sources (in a paper for example). Take a look:
What is plagiarism?
Many people think of plagiarism as copying another's work, or borrowing someone else's original ideas. But terms like "copying" and "borrowing" can disguise the seriousness of the offense:
According to the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, to "plagiarize" means
1) to steal and pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one's own 2) to use (another's production) without crediting the source 3) to commit literary theft 4) to present as new and original an idea or product derived from an existing source.
#'s 1 and 4 apply perfectly here
|
|
|
Post by Roggie on Apr 6, 2006 16:18:46 GMT -8
I was taught by 4 english majors throughout school that Plagarism is an exact copy, if you put it in your own words (what I meant to say, not mix around) it is not plagarism. Putting in own words means removing or changing words. This is what I was taught. Say that's wrong, and I will doubt it extremely, as I am 100% sure I am right.
|
|
|
Post by Hellion II on Apr 6, 2006 16:32:25 GMT -8
mine was an original one. i made it up. even though it sucked.
|
|
|
Post by Roggie on Apr 6, 2006 16:43:26 GMT -8
Chuck Norris has such a large lung capacity, that if he takes a deep breath, he can suffocate the earth. (sucked, but original.)
|
|
|
Post by Zangief on Apr 6, 2006 16:46:17 GMT -8
Well Roggie, take my word on it, your wrong. Do some internet research and see what you find. plageriasim.org turnitin.com From this article from Georgetown University: Plagiarism at Indiana UniversityAll of these support my argument. You cannot just change the words around. This is not a matter of opinion, you are indeed completely wrong in this case. Just like the whole traveling discussion.
|
|
|
Post by Zangief on Apr 6, 2006 16:51:33 GMT -8
Brandon, your's is a complete rip off of "Some people are hung like horses, but horses or hung like chuck norris". You just substituted paintbal for horses, which is plagerism.
However, I will not fault you in this case if you claim to have not seen that one (although thats unlikely).
|
|
|
Post by Zangief on Apr 6, 2006 16:55:22 GMT -8
And one more thing Roggie. I contend that you misinterpreted these "english majors", or just did not understand what they meant. I find it hard to believe they got it wrong, and if they did, I feel sad for them and everyone they have been teaching.
|
|