|
Quake 4
Apr 15, 2006 1:28:45 GMT -8
Post by lx Spooner xl on Apr 15, 2006 1:28:45 GMT -8
my review for my first 360 game
this game is pretty decent...its long, and i have never seen graphics this incredible...and the one i bought comes with quake 2
the only weapon i dont like is the shot gun..its worthless
and my other complaint is not to do with gameplay.....its abougt the developers they dont even mention quake 1....for example: there is a gun in quake 4 called the lightning gun, and they say its brand new..but it was also in quake 1..its like they think quake started at quake 2
anyhoo
its a faily decent game, and its long..i think im about half way done, and the story works...alot of first person shooter games that are long u end up having to do all these poitless tasks, but this game is long because it is
yep..my review pows
|
|
|
Quake 4
Apr 15, 2006 5:07:00 GMT -8
Post by Chief (n7x Dominance) on Apr 15, 2006 5:07:00 GMT -8
that games achievements are worthless
one is make it into the top ten on the leaderboard for only 15 GS
|
|
|
Quake 4
Apr 15, 2006 5:36:42 GMT -8
Post by lx Spooner xl on Apr 15, 2006 5:36:42 GMT -8
so..u wouldn't get a game because it wont boost your gamerscore very high...wow ur stupid
|
|
|
Quake 4
Apr 15, 2006 6:49:30 GMT -8
Post by Roggie on Apr 15, 2006 6:49:30 GMT -8
Since when did gamerscore mean anything? All the better players have lower gamerscores, as proven by people over at Xbox's forums. But, Quake 4 is a lot of fun, the online takes a long time to get used to. It kind of reminds me of going from halo to UT2004 on PC with the speed difference, except the single player is halo speed, while online is UT2004 speed. But, still, great game. First game I'm playing when I get my 360 back from MS.
|
|