|
|
Post by DeluXe on Mar 9, 2006 8:33:29 GMT -8
dude Call of Duty 2 for 360 is sweet...im not into those WW2 games but Call of Duty is awesome....
|
|
|
|
Post by Zangief on Mar 9, 2006 8:57:11 GMT -8
It is fun, and the graphics are awesome on a HD TV.
|
|
|
|
Post by Roggie on Mar 9, 2006 9:21:31 GMT -8
Time for me to rant. The game itself is great. It is fun, graphics own on/off HD, and the gameplay is perfectly smooth. I love the game. But why did I trade it in then? Because the online play SUCKS. It takes 15-20 minutes to find a game, and pretty much 2/3s of the games are either standbyed or host leaves making it lag like shit, then everyone leaves, fucking it up more. It was bad enough to make me trade it in, same with BF2 for Xbox. Great game though. But I play for online multiplayer, not offline multiplayer or single player. (Hey, tradin it in got me Fight Night, so I am happy)
|
|
|
|
Post by Chief (n7x Dominance) on Mar 9, 2006 15:28:05 GMT -8
apparently you have been playing wrong people because not once have i had a bad COD 2 online game
|
|
|
|
Post by Roggie on Mar 9, 2006 16:34:48 GMT -8
ARE YOU SERIOUS? How long does it take you to get in a game? Any ranked game I play it is jacked.
|
|
|
|
Post by TequilaDo on Mar 9, 2006 18:57:20 GMT -8
dude you are getting so ripped off when you trade in games holy crap man! i would never trade in a game no matter how bad it is
|
|
|
|
Post by Roggie on Mar 10, 2006 14:48:04 GMT -8
How is that getting ripped off? Getting money to get a new game, or letting a game sit on your shelves and not get anything for it? If I don't play a game, and doubt I will again, it gets traded in. Money > a game not being used EVER.
|
|
|
|
Post by TequilaDo on Mar 11, 2006 7:45:05 GMT -8
yea but how many game do you have to trade in to actually get a new game!?! like 5 or 6?
|
|
|
|
Post by Roggie on Mar 11, 2006 7:56:32 GMT -8
No... More like 2 or 3. You buy a game used, and you get it for less, and I have a discount card, so i get them for even less. I got a 360 mic for 9 bucks, with the discount and stuff. But, you never answered the question. Would you rather have a game sitting on your shelf, never being used, or money towards a new game? (You are not the only one i know who does not trade in games. I am on my friend in real life about why he should. It makes sense)
|
|
|
|
Post by Zangief on Mar 13, 2006 14:38:28 GMT -8
how about renting games instead of wasting your money? And I agree with Tequila, trading in games is dumb. What happens if in a few months, you want to play that game again? Then you don't have it and you got a 10th of your money back for it. If you are going to be on an endless cycle of buying games then selling them back, you might as well rent.
|
|
|
|
Post by Roggie on Mar 13, 2006 15:18:12 GMT -8
A tenth? more like half. and, i did rent Cod. it was good for 2 weeks, then the online fell apart after people figured out you can standby.
|
|
