|
Post by lx Spooner xl on Feb 10, 2006 0:57:14 GMT -8
when i first started playing this game ..i was like...wow this is lame...but once i finsiehd it i said to myself...WOW..that game was actualy pretty fun
sure some of the lines are cheezy..but they use the same lines over and over as a joke that it just becomes sooo funny
i have the usual complaints....voice acting sucked...stupid animations but the story was insanely cool.....basicly u go back intime to stop some guy from creating a army of these creatures called time splitters, to save humanity (what else eh)....and along the way u risk creating paradoxes by helping your future self or past self out...u travel in time through the 1900's all the way to the futre looking for these time crystals..(and they haev a very good reason for being on earth) the weapons are freaking sweet...some very creative and cool weapons....im pretty sure the online is going to suck because it is an EA game afterall
i got this for 35.99canadian$4 at ebgames used and it was worth it...if ur bored and u have nothing better to do i would get this game it was cool...
|
|
|
Post by Roggie on Feb 11, 2006 7:41:21 GMT -8
This game is fun online. And what do you mean EA games suck online? pfft. Burnout Revenge, Nascar 06... Must i continue?
|
|
|
Post by lx Spooner xl on Feb 11, 2006 10:26:07 GMT -8
ea pumps out soooo many games a year ..and a HUGE chunk of the games are lame..boring..cheezy. ea make trys to hard to make their games "fun" for every console that they turn out to be super gay they only make a good game once in a blue moon
ea also makes alot of their games for playstation..and there is a huge difference between playstation games and xbox games.....
|
|
|
Post by Roggie on Feb 11, 2006 10:29:11 GMT -8
I honestly can say I cannot think of an EA game trhat I did not enjoy fully, other than the new Tony Hawk games. (1-3 raped)
|
|
|
Post by Capn Spanky on Feb 11, 2006 10:35:55 GMT -8
Battlefield 2 for PC is an EA game. THAT ONLINE OWNS!!! I could seriously play it all day. (And, I have...)
|
|
|
Post by lx Spooner xl on Feb 11, 2006 11:49:39 GMT -8
batlefield is an exeption where they got it right.....but thats only one game out of mabey 50 they pump out each year..u only ever hear about the good games
|
|
|
Post by Roggie on Feb 11, 2006 12:34:45 GMT -8
Name some bad ones. I cannot think of any.
|
|
|
Post by lx Spooner xl on Feb 11, 2006 18:46:39 GMT -8
harry potter games medal of honor front line (graphics are so weak ...they are bad even for a game that is for playstation also..gameplay blows lord of the rings the sims on xbox (it was good on pc...but i am going to point out here that ea didn't really make the game....maxis made the game and ea bought maxis) im bored..
and its not that they are bad...its that they try to make them work on all computers and cosoles..and they sacrifice good cinematics/gameplay/cool shit for that and it makes the game less fun...AND THEY ALWAYS HIRE VOICE ACTORS WHO CANT ACT....the voice actors in halo 2/half life 2/area 51/and darkwatch were good they made u feel like u were in teh game..but ea games have voice actors who sound like they are a cartoon character
|
|
|
Post by Roggie on Feb 12, 2006 8:28:14 GMT -8
Hah, you got me on that one. Medal of Honor does suck. Never played the harry potter or LoTR games, hate them both with a passion. The sims wasn't really bad at all on gamecube, it was actually a lot of fun. if the xbox version is the same, then i see no complaints with it.
|
|