|
|
Post by Hellion II on Feb 10, 2006 23:17:43 GMT -8
lets look at this like a science experiment. when conducting an experiment, you would want to have multiple tests, so you get more results, resulting ina better and more accurate conclusion.
more tests= more results= more accurate conclusion.
got it?
so if tyler had tken the results from one game, that would not have been enough evidence to prove we owned them. which we did, as you can see by the net kill and total kills.
|
|
|
|
Post by Capn Spanky on Feb 11, 2006 0:50:45 GMT -8
well, then using ur logic, add up points scored, rebounds made, and assists per team. Then put those over all of the turnovers and fouls. In the end, Duke still comes out on top, And, Duke OWNED UNC. Because, UNC had homecourt advantage over at Chapel Hill.
|
|
|
|
Post by Roggie on Feb 11, 2006 10:31:35 GMT -8
And UNC had a bunch of Freshman.
|
|
|
|
Post by speed on Feb 11, 2006 10:37:58 GMT -8
well, then using ur logic, add up points scored, rebounds made, and assists per team. Then put those over all of the turnovers and fouls. In the end, Duke still comes out on top, And, Duke OWNED UNC. Because, UNC had homecourt advantage over at Chapel Hill. Exactly. Duke still won. I'm perfectly fine with you calling it ownage, but by saying that ours was a MIGHTY close game but duke owned UNC is hypocrisy. |
|
|
|
Post by Capn Spanky on Feb 11, 2006 10:43:05 GMT -8
Duke OWNED UNC. It wasnt a one point game like I thought it was going to end up being. In the last half minute, Duke got to the point where UNC had no POSSIBLE way of catching back up (except for a made 3 point shot with a foul on the shot. Or, Duke HANDING UNC the ball). That right there is ownage. Beating a team and making it so they can't catch back up in time. The F4 game was close, because they still had a reasonable chance of winning. One power weapon shift in some of those games and they could have won. It was a good game, and we still own. But, I dont think this is real OWNAGE. You guys want to see Halo ownage? Phoenix, Keven, TJ, and I beat a team in team snipers 40 to -6. We held them at 3 for the first 30 kills. Then, they started killing themselves. PWNED
|
|
|
|
Post by Roggie on Feb 11, 2006 11:19:57 GMT -8
You need a new definition of owned. It is only owned when they have no chance of catching up after 5 minutes. It was a 4 point lead at, what, 40 seconds left? that is not ownage...
|
|
|
|
Post by Capn Spanky on Feb 11, 2006 11:29:19 GMT -8
Ur right. Pwnage.
|
|
|
|
Post by Roggie on Feb 11, 2006 11:31:03 GMT -8
No, you are wrong again. you didn't even read what i said. You are proving yourself a bigger idiot in my eyes than you ever have before, and i did not think that would be possible.
|
|
|
|
Post by speed on Feb 11, 2006 12:36:13 GMT -8
Joe, you looked at the final score of our game. You don't know the story and im not going to bother to tell you, but I will say that all that matters is how well we did vs F4. NOT OUTBREAK.
|
|
|
|
Post by Capn Spanky on Feb 12, 2006 1:34:42 GMT -8
Hmmm.. well, than ANYONE can win a 2 v 3. (Even UNC. You Heard me Roggie). Outbreak was a key asset in SOME of those games. But, what about some of the OTHER ones? Out break took what place? DEAD LAST! So, saying u pwned xF4x in a 2 v. 3 is like saying my current salary OWNS Abraham Lincoln's current slary. I deny being an idiot, because Duke DID own UNC. Duke OWNS. period. Roggie, u find flaw with my logic, because u in fact, are a UNC fan. U are insulted by the fact that I OWN U!
|
|
|
|
Post by Chief (n7x Dominance) on Feb 12, 2006 6:08:23 GMT -8
outbreak may have come in last but he had actually more kills 12, and more assists 10 and less deaths 17 than overdose himself.. overdose should have come in last that game and 2 of his deaths were suicides!
|
|
|
|
Post by Capn Spanky on Feb 12, 2006 11:25:39 GMT -8
I dont think u guys understand here. This is ALL about Biases. U guys are all sharing Jeremy's bias against xF4x because of its members and Jeremy's obvious dislike for them. In that case, u say owned. I dont, I am not as biased and I dont think it was real ownage. Same case with the Duke UNC game. I am a religious Duke fan. When they win, it OWNS. They are an ownage team. When they beat UNC, UNC got OWNED by Duke. Sure, it was close, but do I care? NO, BECAUSE IM BIASED AGAINST UNC. Roggie, consider urself pwned.
|
|
|
|
Post by speed on Feb 12, 2006 15:26:01 GMT -8
No joe, i was NOT comparing it in a 2v3 scenario because i was COMPARING STATS vs each other NOT ENDING SCORE. Outbreak was a key asset in more than 50% of the games, He was their MVP.
You say some of the other games outbreak wasnt like its supposed to be in plural form, he did "bad" in one out of three games.
Also please dont try to put words in my mouth here and tell me what i am and not bias against it makes you seem arrogant. If you read all the way down here put a number ten in your next post. You can continue to say it wasnt ownage and we will continue to say it was, but I think that the people actually there and actually take the time to look at the stats have more voice.
Put any other F4 noob in outbreaks place it would have been even more ownage.
|
|
|
|
Post by Capn Spanky on Feb 12, 2006 15:49:41 GMT -8
10. BUT IT WASNT OWNAGE. U GUYS WON BY LESS THAN TEN EACH GAME. THAT is considered a close game. Duke owns because I LIKE Duke. Tyler, did u even READ all the way to the bottom of MY last post? U see, ur jumping to conclusions proves ur arrogance. Go re read what I said earlier a couple more times, but grab a dictionary and look up all of the words i use. then, it might make sense to you.
|
|
|
|
Post by speed on Feb 12, 2006 16:05:09 GMT -8
It's funny how your using the word "ownage" as if it is a fact. I'll clear it up for you. Ownage is an opinion, and I can say i owned whenever I want. There is nothing you can do about it besides state your own opinion. (which so you know, doesn't mean anything to me at the moment, especially on this topic) I haven't jumped to any conclusions besides the fact that i said i owned them, and so you know I have the right to do that.
You can tell me who your biased against and biased for all day Joe, but its not going to change my mind on anything I have said so far.
I will also point out the fact that you are being an asshole. Thats right. How many times have i rained on your parade? None. Because I respected the fact that you thought it was a good game and thats all that matters is what YOU think. I have the courtesy to keep my mouth shut even if i saw a game that you said was ownage and i disagreed. So while I'm grabbing a dictionary (though I don't see why i would need one) you go to your parents and get some lessons on how to act politely.
|
|
