|
|
Post by Capn Spanky on Jul 12, 2006 21:24:41 GMT -8
I was wondering if we were going to do another regiment battle. Can we start to brainstorm the next Regiment battle? Homestarmy needs to regain control.
|
|
|
|
Post by FrkUout on Jul 12, 2006 22:04:55 GMT -8
Even so, we'd only tie the series again. I believe Jeremy has started thinking of something again. My thoughts are a map battle with a vote for the next map to have stacks of Zanhammer bodies all over it. We'll rename is the Zanhammer cemetery after we win.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nobody on Jul 12, 2006 22:23:09 GMT -8
cemetary...cemetary.... i think we should do sactuary. Zanhammers can have their own sanctuary after they lose
|
|
|
|
Post by FrkUout on Jul 12, 2006 22:32:13 GMT -8
Nice correlation Meesam
|
|
|
|
Post by Nobody on Jul 12, 2006 22:46:26 GMT -8
lol, thanks rick. I would have done hangem high, but we cant.
|
|
|
|
Post by Capn Spanky on Jul 13, 2006 10:08:08 GMT -8
I think Regiment battles should be chosen by the regiment that was defeated in the previous battle.
|
|
|
|
Post by Zangief on Jul 13, 2006 10:14:56 GMT -8
I think a regiment battle is in order. Let decide on what by today so we can get started soon. I will be on vacation for 2 weeks at the beginning of august, it would be in our interest to get well underway before I leave.
Joe, I think the Homestarmy can chose the battle, but the Zanhammers will have veto power since we won the last one. Here are a few typical serious options:
Map battle (sanctuary, beaver creek, warlock, ivory tower, those are the only decent maps left)
Objective battle (oddball, KotH, assault...)
we can go really silly if you want, make any suggestions.
|
|
|
|
Post by Roggie on Jul 13, 2006 10:20:16 GMT -8
I think objective battles would be fun. I would love to see some CTF only, since I feel that is the most skillful and fun gametype.
|
|
|
|
Post by Zangief on Jul 13, 2006 10:38:38 GMT -8
We already did a CTF regiment battle.
|
|
|
|
Post by Roggie on Jul 13, 2006 11:14:09 GMT -8
I know, but there's things we've also done before, and it never hurts to do things a second time. And, they are usually better the 2nd time around.
|
|
|
|
Post by Capn Spanky on Jul 13, 2006 12:24:41 GMT -8
Hmmmm... well, I guess we'll begin discussion in the Homestarmy super secret board. A battle for Warlock sounds like it would be alot of fun.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nobody on Jul 13, 2006 17:26:11 GMT -8
I think we should do territories.
|
|
|
|
Post by lx Spooner xl on Jul 13, 2006 19:44:51 GMT -8
why dont u guys redo all of the individual tournaments to toss spartan and calico on their asses for good.....leaderboard wise
|
|
|
|
Post by TequilaDo on Jul 13, 2006 21:35:18 GMT -8
i think that Low Ball i think its called is a really fun game, becuase every person on the team has to have a set amount of time with the ball so that way you cant just have a ball bitch everybody has to have it, that would be fun. i think i would get back on just for a good game of that hahha
|
|
|
|
Post by Roggie on Jul 14, 2006 5:41:33 GMT -8
Minimum games only? Like Lowball, Minimum Slayer, I don't know, one for Territories? That would be hella fun.
|
|
